Tuesday, April 9, 2019

The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde Essay Example for Free

The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde EssayIn my prove I am going to discuss the floor c tout ensembleed The Strange casing of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. This bol hotshoty is a pre 20th century Gothic invention writ ten by Robert Louis St unconstipatedson. When I say a gothic novel I dont soused someaffair of the dingy ages still ca-caher a composition that has a dark deep tosh which ventures into the unknown. This story is typical of the 19th century when bulk had radical ideas which were questionable to those in strait-laced familiarity. The story starts with a person called Mr Hyde trampling over a young girl and producing a cheque with Dr Jekylls name on it to pay for the damage done to the girl. Later Dr Jekylls con miscellanys find that he has make a volition to a creation named Mr Hyde that was to be given to him at a lower place doctor Jekylls death or disappearance. His friends animadvert that he has been be or forced to make a for puzzle to this p uckish man Mr Hyde.Later in the story the whole mystery was revealed to us. Dr Jekyll was involved in an experi handst which was supposed to break the bond amid redeeming(prenominal) and evil. This barrier of replete(p) and evil could be put in comparison with Soho and Cavendish Squ atomic number 18. The experiment that Dr Jekyll was involved in made his evil side come out which was Mr Hyde further to do this Dr Jekyll had to drink a potion. later onwards a while Hydes appearance could no longer be go overled with the potion nevertheless came out when ever Dr Jekyll treat off. This is wherefore Dr Jekyll made a allow to Hyde because he was afraid that he will never be able to turn back to his normal self and Hyde will cast money to spend sooner of having nonhing. Later I will discuss this in to a greater extent detail exactly now I will talk about the setting of the novel.In the novel Stevenson uses different personas to show and express the composition of mans hypo critical and divided nature, one of these characters is Dr Lanyon. When he is with his friends his behaviour seems to show someone who is a good friend and will do a lot to help his friends out only when it comes to his theme he will non help his friends as he previously would become if it did non involve his reputation and separates who stomach ruined their reputation by their deeds. One shell of this is when he was dying he said I have had a shock and I shall never recover. There it sounded as if he has signed his crack to death, yet later when Jekyll is mentioned he says I wish to see or hear no to a greater extent of Dr Jekyll. He didnt say wherefore he didnt want to see him any more he was actually vague as he was trying to keep his own reputation and that of Jekylls. This may seem a nice thing to do but if it involves something as serious as someone changing into the wicked character of Hyde who kills multitude such(prenominal)(prenominal) as Sir Danvers C bew t hen to protect them seems wrong.Gabriel Utterson is supposed to be the perfect valet de chambre he shows this by trying to find out peoples chores and trying to solve them but without the problems be gossiped about. An exemplification of this is when he lay down the will that Dr Jekyll had made to Hyde which would have allowed Hyde to have Jekylls money after his disappearance for more than 3 months or his death. This concerned Utterson so he talked to Jekyll himself and said I have been waiting to tell to you, Jekyllyou know that will of yours?That is just one of the many credits that could be found since it shows that he had a certain interest in his friends and by the manner of the sentence construction it looks ilk he is speaking to Jekyll in a calm manner with a listening ear and someone who speaks like this would unlikely be a gossiper. Despite his kindness and loyalty to his friends he solace wasnt the perfect gentleman since he was attracted to those of the prudish under populace. This suggests that visits to built in beds like Soho is non out of the question and this defies his outer reputation so the saying never mark a book by its cover fits nicely here as even though Utterson seems such an upright man he still under his cover has something to hide.Furthermore the woman at Hydes board is an otherwise example of double-dealing. She is smoothed faced and well mannered when she comes to the inlet but no dubiousness has evil transaction with Hyde which her demeanour hides.Mr Hyde is the closelipped controversial of characters. He is the evil side of Dr Jekyll. We know the sort of things Hyde gets up to such as his assault on people, his murders and the fact that he resides in Soho gives an idea of his conduct. These sorts of actions be not associated with Dr Jekyll but it is still him that is doing it. This shows that even though Jekyll seems to be respectable he has evil judgments and this is uttered through his metamorphosis into Hyde where all his evil comes to the fore.Discussing Jekyll shows that once he had conducted his experiment and proved that he had baffled the barrier between good and evil he continued conducting these experiments and he knew what Hyde was doing but he still let Hyde rampage until he couldnt be controlled. So this shows that though one may have good intentions in the beginning they force out be changed by unforeseen circumstances so it shows that it is hard to control that quality of evil. You could say that Enfield leads a double aliveness as he saw the girl world trampled down he must have been out at that late hour of 0300 and he would have but been out at that measure if he was venturing down the streets of Soho doing things that speed class Victorian gild would not allow him.Stevenson used the idea of on that point being a beast inside a man in the character of Hyde. We saw that Hyde had carnal like qualities. In the novella he was found to be shrinking back with a hissing intake of breath signifying that he had snake like qualities in him. Also, when Poole was describing when he saw a thing in the house which he thought may have been Jekyll he said If it were my master why did he cry out like rat and run from me, that shows another animal like quality that Hyde possessed. Here Hyde was depicted as apply animal like qualities, without conscience suggesting that evil is easily committed. This theme of there being a beast in a man was developed by Charles Darwins theory of humans developing from apes so Stevenson gave his central character these qualities had beast like qualities.Following on from that Victorian people were obsessed by the idea of recidivism. This is when they thought that the abject were going to turn into animals and the rich were worried by the collapse of societal values. This suggests that we all have evil in us. I dont compute that we have good or evil in us but it is up to us to be good or evil. Anyone slew do anythin g evil, but the thing is whether their conscience will bother them. In 99 people out of 100 people their consciences will bother them if they killed someone on the other hand in the case of Hyde he had no problem killing another human being.Stevenson uses a number of symbols to beef up important themes in the novel. Perhaps the most powerful symbol in the novella is found in the contrast of the rear and comportment entrances of the house. The door that represents innocence and decency is the front door. This is the door where Dr Jekyll usually enters. This door represents excellence because it is in Cavendish Square this area has a reputation of being the dwelling place of the most respectable people in London. The front of the house, where the front door is situated, is clean and maintained to an exemplary standard and gives an air of purity. However, the door and the stylish exterior controvert the existence of Hyde in Jekyll.A door is used to depict the evil secretive side of Dr Jekyll. This can be said because the lab outhouse is an old dilapidated building as shown by this quote and bore in every feature the marks of prolonged negligence. The door which was equipped with neither campana nor knocker, was blistered and distained. This shows that no care was shown to this building that was in fact part of Dr Jekylls house. This rear door was in Soho even though it is the same house as doctor Jekylls. Since there are two sides of the house it coincides with the two sided nature of Dr Jekyll whose other side is Hyde. This is why Hyde uses the back door that represents evil because it is in Soho and is derelict and why Jekyll uses the front door which is clean and represents Jekylls innocent nature.Soho gives the connotation of iniquity and wickedness, because in Soho there were many little people who went to all kinds of lengths to get money some of these are things like stealing and prostitution which you do not associate with purity and hence door deno tes vice. Stevenson seems to be saying that being silly is being evil, however you cant judge a person from their material possessions but the environment they are in can affect their behaviour.In the novella Stevenson uses images of buildings with locked doors, those without windows or barred windows. I entail these symbols give a sense of being trapped. In this case evil is trapped behind locked doors. Some doors were opened to no one. This was not uncommon in Victorian society. These were things associated with recluses. The reason why I use this is that Jekyll was locked in his locker for a very long time. This is a symbolism of Dr Jekylls soul trying to suppress something evil from advent out which is Hyde. This is shown in Dr Jekylls narrative when he says It took on this occasion a double dose to conceive me to myself so he was trying to suppress Hyde by taking this double dose of potion. Some other images that will fill this niche well are barred windows because this de picts some thing urging to get out but is being obstructed by a barrier. This at first represented Hyde when Jekyll had only started to take his potion but later this represented Jekyll when Hyde was raging and Jekyll was charge him out.Stevenson uses the characters lyric in The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde to show us how honest or dishonest characters are. Some of the characters are honest in their speech and usually which is calm and straight forward because they have nothing to hide. On the other hand, even though Poole was honest he was very frightened when he was talking to Utterson about the mysterious happening of Dr Jekyll he said I have been afraid for a week and I can bear it no more. Here Poole was being very honest about the fact that he was scared of the situation in the house so honesty does not always mean that you are going to be relaxed but you still can be tense when telling the truth. Enfield can besides be an honest loudspeaker even though he is a bi t of a gossiper.Some other characters that are not so honest include Lanyon and Jekyll. We can tell this because they are reserved secretive and even perfunctory with their own friends. For example, Jekyll speaks in a very reserved manner and secretive way with his own friends. An example of this is when he is speaking to Utterson about the will You do not understand my position, I am painfully situated, Utterson my position is very strange. It is one of those affairs that cannot be mended by talking. There we see that he was very vague with his own friend, which is a very strange position. You could at least explain to your friend but since Jekyll had Hyde to hide he glazed over the subject leaving Utterson mystified.There is another example of this in the case of Dr Lanyon when he was speaking to Utterson about Jekyll he said I swear to God I will never set eyes on him again. He did not say why he would not set eyes on him. Even though he was saving the reputation of Jekyll and k eeping to his doctors agreement not to release any information he still should of told Utterson because when Jekyll turned into Hyde lives were at peril as Hyde was a person of evil. So Stevenson shows that Victorian people of the upper class still strayed from their nonindulgent boundaries and were hypocritical they did this because they had something to Hyde.Using a number of different techniques and images Stevenson stools a dark and menacing setting for the novel. just about of the action in the novel that in involves Hyde takes place under the cover of darkness and Stevenson frequently reminds us with this by giving us images of strike and dark.Light can change peoples moods all the way from smart and cheery to the opposite of dark and menacing. It is interesting that Stevenson uses a dark black pass morning when Enfield meets Hyde. This prominent tension something bad had happened at that time hence Stevenson uses darkness to depict something sinister. Stevenson excess ively refers quite a lot to lamps as they have to do with light. In the story it says My way lay through a part of town where there was literally nothing to be seen but lamps. This depicts darkness in other words evil, and there is some good, the lamps, but where there is too much darkness and too a couple of(prenominal) lamps it is like evil overwhelming the good. This scene was at 3oclock in the morning when most good people are asleep so this gives criminals the chance to be active without being spotted so this is why that scene was effective because the corruption by far outweighed the good.Stevenson compares the streets of London to a labyrinth, which depicts that London is an easy place to get lost in therefore it would be a criminals paradise as they can do anything and weave themselves through the streets of London away from pursuers such as the police or victims of the crime. This can also depict Dr Jekylls lost soul as he cant seem to induce himself back but being contin uously being over ridden by Hyde, his evil side.Stevenson shows us how deserted the streets of London were at night time Street after street and all the folks asleep street after street, all lighted up as if for a procession and all as empty as a church. That really shows how deserted the streets of London were as empty as a church. This is when Hyde went about his dealings such as the murder of Sir Danvers Carew. Another example of the silence is in Chapter 2 By ten oclock, when the shops were closed the by street was very solitary, and in spite of the low growl of London from all round, very silent. So if a place is very solitary and very silent it must be desolate except for those who do things under the cover of darkness such as criminals and those who have something to hide.To create setting with a particularly threatening and depressing atmosphere, Stevenson uses words and phrases such as great umber coloured pall visited over heaven to depict a dark and livingless time with no brightness to be seen. Another example is mournful reinvasion of darkness. This makes it seem as if bright has been there for a very short time but and darkness is coming again. This shows that it must be winter time. Also used is some city in a nightmare that quote explains itself. Dingy street, brownness as umber and blackguardly surrounding all describe what Soho was like.These phrases also seem to show a war between light and dark. The above is a description of the morning but there is also a lot of mention of dark. This war between light and dark has been made by Stevenson to reinforce some of the central themes of good versus evil. A quote between shows this war between light and dark is this for a moment, the fog would be quite broken up, and a haggard shaft of daylight light of daylight would glance between the swirling wreaths so that shows only for a while there are prosperous spells and quickly they disappear from the fog. When those two forces are equal this was l ike when Jekyll resumed have his dinner parties. Stevenson uses every day phrases to depict great powerful images and these images are relevant to people in his day so that is why his stories work so well.By setting his novel in the heart of London, between Cavendish Square and Soho, Stevenson allows us to see the divisions between the rich and the poor in Victorian society. All of the main characters in the novel are rich excluding the illusive figure of Hyde who is a rich person because he is Jekyll but lives as person who is neither rich nor poor. The rich characters are supposedly solid, respectable men, and should be possessed by people like lawyers and doctors. These are men who have a high social status in Victorian society and could afford a expectant house with a butler and many servants. This gave these people, such as Jekyll, a sense of power over other people. In our story it seems as if Dr Jekylls reputation for being an upright, good and exact person is being lost wit h his association with Mr Hyde that is why he seems to timid away from the subject of Hyde when it appears in conversation.The area where Dr Jekyll, Mr Utterson and Dr Lanyon live is a wealthy and respectable area in the heart of Londons West End, Cavendish Sqaure. It is imperative that men of such status live in these areas, as they co-occurrence the high social status they are supposed to have. They would not find themselves in an area such as Soho, let alone live in it, but one person Mr Hyde is a disreputable man and seems to have no awareness of social standing. Soho is amazingly within a mile of Cavendish Square but the contrast of the two places is immeasurable. One would presume that because two areas are in such close neighborhood they would be fairly similar, in the case of Soho and Cavendish Square you would not be more wrong. Soho is destitute, the streets are grubby and you would find it impossible to find a clean spot, beggars sit outside the door hoping people wil l give them money, there are people who are ready to jump you if they get a powderpuff of money on you, and women that prostate themselves in brothels to get money.These are the sort of places that respectable people go to satisfy their desires under the cover darkness. In contrast Cavendish Square is clean and filled with lavishly furnish and structurally sound buildings unlike those in Soho where the houses are decrepit and beyond repair. Since the houses in Cavendish Square are so grand you would think that they would be housed by honest people but we know that not all of the people are as honourable as they seem. Going into more detail the lives of those in Cavendish Square would consist of many dinner parties, studying and for the younger generation there would be cud of balls.Most of these upper class people would distain the thought of leading a life like those in Soho as they were very comfortable and were engulfed around this lifestyle. Also the difference between the wo men of the upper class and lower class is that those of the upper class would have very little free choice as these were controlled by a man of the family whether that is their husband brother or father. In the lower classes the women had more say as they had to do what they could to earn money to live on but this was unnecessary for the upper class as a few pounds here and there would not make much difference to their hundreds of thousands to millions of pounds.In this essay Stevenson was trying to make us think about the nature of humans in Victorian society. In Victorian society there were great rifts between the rich and the poor. These rifts made the upper class think that the poor were beast as they had to go to seemingly animalistic means to get the food that they needed. What these upper class people didnt realise was that if you put two completely different people in close proximity the worst of people would come out. This can be said because if you went in to the country i n that time you would find farmers doing their work to get money, they had the opportunity to earn an honest living but not in London. London was an over crowded place at that time and was nowhere as large as it is now.Factory work was the most popular line of work for the lower class people but those found in Soho were unable to find jobs to earn an honest living. The upper classes obviously did not realise the reason for poor life in Soho hence became obsessed by the idea of recidivism. This is why I think this story has that theme as Stevenson was trying to explore ideas as to why the poor lived in such an animalistic state. Stevenson has made me think of why the lower class Victorian society had to go so low to survive that is why I have the explanation above. The setting of Victorian London is a fitting setting for this type of novel because this is a time when there were a great deal of mysteries that were not mentioned because of superstition and so remained a mystery.In a m odern society though these are no longer mysteries as the problems to these solutions has been solved. The solution is to treat everyone equally or have equal opportunities with this no one can blame any one for their poor quality of life but themselves. unfortunately this can only be said of richer countries as they have the monetary capabilities to give every one these opportunities. In Victorian times you automatically were judged by the class you were born in to and had a poor education so therefore you did not have the opportunities of those today. The reason why Stevenson wanted us to think about the difference between classes is that he grew up in Edinburgh where the difference between the classes was greater he witnessed poverty, disease and over crowding near to his place of dwelling, a middle class New Town. This could be associated with the closeness of the two places of Soho and Cavendish Square. This city fed Stevensons young mind of the supernatural so that is why he thought of the character of Hyde pure evil.Another point of discussion is three-foldity. Stevenson made us think whether men have an evil side or not. I do not think that men can separate themselves into two simply by drinking a potion but they could have a dual personality by leading a double life. This point was a prevalent point in the story with the example of Jekyll hiding things from people using his double personality to do what ever he wants to. Many people did this in Victorian times but not having two characters but using the cover of darkness to do what they would not dare to do in the daylight as their reputability was very important to them in other words they were hypocritical. Stevenson was trying to use this subject of respectability which he had a problem with. He wanted to see what other people thought about his life style without using himself in the story but by substituting himself with the two characters of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.When he was 17 and studying eng ineering he was living a respectable life by day and under the cover of darkness he was living a debauched life that would not befit the life of someone in the middle classes. Because of the hypocrisy he witnessed, and was going through himself he wanted to bring to peoples attention that the seemingly perfect upper and middle classes were not what they seemed but on the whole a hypocritical bunch of people. Now days the things that the poor got up to dont seem as bad but when we look to authority we find it shocking to learn what goes on. An example of this is of Bill Clinton. We all know the story that he was having an affair with someone else when he was married and managed to hide it for some time. So think again, hypocrisy still goes on today.This essay had a great deal to do with the Victorian culture as this idea of duality perplexed many doctors and scientists of that day Stevenson tried to find the explanation for himself and no disbelieve other people of the day had tried to find the answer. Like the person who wrote a short story called Markhiem that had characters living double lives in it. Stevenson had a fetish about this idea of duality, it was no doubt because of his illness and inability to spend much time outside his bedroom and therefore his nurse told him stories about the differences between life of good and evil with the life of evil leading to a life in hell.This made him have terrible nightmares which stuck to him through out his whole life this is why in his stories he draw Hyde as having the mark of Satan. Stevenson recalls his nurse telling him there are but two camps in the world one perfectly pious and respectable, one of the perfectly mundane and vicious one mostly on its knees and singing hymns, the other on the high road to the gallows and the bottomless pit. This no doubt made him think of the idea of recidivism because if one were so vicious they must be nearer to an animal instead of a human.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.